Author: Sumaya Laher

HPCSA Policy Guidelines

HPCSA Policy Guidelines (Ethical rules, classification of psychometric tests, undesirable business practice, exam policy, exam guidelines)

Mock questions for Psychometrics (these are not questions from past papers and are by no means exhaustive but will provide some practice for the exam)

Sample: Registered Counsellor Exam (this is not a document from the HPCSA. A previous student has placed this as a sample on his website)

Collated material for HPCSA Registered Counsellor Exam (this may be outdated and is not verified)

Psychometrics Practice Questions

1. Briefly discuss the difference between psychological testing and psychological assessment.

2. Describe how the following has impacted on psychological test use and development in South Africa:

  • Apartheid
  • The Employment Equity Act

3. Briefly discuss what norms are and what they do

4. List four of the most common types of norm scores found in psychometric assessments

5. Explain what a percentile score is

6. What is a z-score in the context of norming for psychological tests

7. Briefly discuss what is meant by a deviation IQ scale

8. The Employment Equity Act stipulates three conditions for psychological testing in South Africa. Identify the three conditions and briefly discuss why these conditions were legislated in South Africa.

9. What is meant by reliability in psychometrics?

10. Identify and define the four types of reliability that should be considered when developing or using tests.

11. Name two coefficients that can be used to assess internal consistency (inter-item consistency) reliability.

12. Will it be appropriate to calculate inter-scorer reliability on the NEO-PI-R? Substantiate your answer.

13. Identify and briefly discuss three factors that may influence the reliability of a test and what can be done to overcome these factors to improve reliability.

14. Explain what is meant by the concept “standard error of measurement.”

15. If a measure has a standard error of measurement is 4 and a person’s observed score is 15, what can you deduce about the person’s true score?

16. What is meant by validity in psychometrics?

17. Identify and define the four types of reliability that should be considered when developing or using tests.

18. Briefly explain three ways in which the construct validity of an instrument might be established.

19. What is a validity coefficient?

20. Identify and distinguish between the two subtypes of criterion validity.

21. Identify and briefly discuss three factors that may influence the validity of a test and what can be done to overcome these factors to improve validity.

22. Distinguish between the concepts of bias and fairness as they used within psychometrics.

23. What aspects in the testing process can be identified as:

  • Construct bias
  • Method bias
  • Item bias

24. What is meant by the term “response bias”?

25. Identify and discuss two common types of response biases commonly found in psychological assessments

26. Identify the three commonly cited criteria which are used for item selection when developing tests.

27. What is meant by the term response format?

28. Identify and briefly discuss three potential test response formats focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of each.

29. Briefly discuss the difference between statistical and clinical significance

30. Identify two methods that are used for detecting differential item functioning.

31. Why do we need to translate or adapt measures in the South African context?

32. Why are norms used?

33. Which body is responsible for the classification and oversight of psychological tests in South Africa?

34. What are the two major functions of the HPCSA?

35. Briefly explain what is meant by the classification of psychological measures.

36. Explain what is meant by the following terms:

  • Test wiseness
  • Culture fair
  • Culture free
  • Culture reduced
  • Culture loaded
  • Acculturation
  • Culture
  • Computerized testing
  • Online testing
  • Etic tests
  • Emic tests
  • Pseudo-etic tests
  • Test standardization
  • Test adaptation
  • Test translation

37. What is meant by adaptability testing as used by Simon Biesheuvel in the 1940’s?

38. Explain the following statement: “psychological assessment is under statutory control.”

39. List the professionals who may use psychological tests in south Africa as well as their qualifications and the restrictions placed on their use of the tests.

40. Briefly discuss the scope of practice for a psychometrist in independent practice.

41. Briefly discuss why it is important for psychologists to have a good working knowledge of the Mental Health Act, Act 17 of 2002.

42. Briefly discuss why it is important for psychologists to have a good working knowledge of the Health Professions Act, Act 56 of 1974 and subsequent ammendments.

43. Explain what is meant by:

  • informed consent,
  • confidentiality,
  • the right to feedback

in the context of psychological assessment.

44. What is meant by rapport in the context of psychological assessment?

1. Identify the steps to be followed in the development of a psychological test. Briefly discuss these steps and reflect on some of the challenges involved in this process

2. Translating of tests is not always easy particularly in the South African context. Briefly discuss the procedure involved in translating a test and reflect on some of the challenges involved in this process.

3. Identify and discuss some of the major pitfalls (historical and current) associated with using psychological measures in the South African context

4. The Health Professions Act, Act 56 of 1974, defines specific criteria related to psychological assessment. Identify and briefly discuss these criteria.

5. Define and briefly discuss what is meant by fair and ethical assessment practices as set out in the ITC International Guidelines for Test Use.

6. Based on the Ethical Code of Conduct document for psychologists, identify and discuss the practices that assessment practitioners should follow.

7. According to the ITC International Guidelines for Test Use, there are several aspects that a policy on testing needs to cover. Identify and briefly discuss six of these reflecting on what the challenges might be in the South African context for undertaking these actions.

8. There are 5 models of ensuring fairness in assessment that are discussed in the literature. Identify and critically these models.

9. Briefly discuss why it is important for psychologists to have a good working knowledge of Chapter 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. In your argument make reference to the key aspects highlighted in Chapter 2.

10. Identify and discuss five factors that influence the use of psychological testing in South Africa.

8. What is standardization in the context of psychological assessment?

9. Why do we standardize tests?

16. What is meant by the term response format?

22. Explain the following statement: “psychological assessment is under statutory control.”

23. Briefly discuss the scope of practice for a psychometrist in independent practice.

25. Why should a psychologist or psychometrist have a working knowledge of:

  • The Child Justice Act
  • The Schools Act
  • The Criminal Procedures Act

27. There are three conditions under which informed consent is not necessary but recommended. What are these?

28. What is meant by rapport in the context of psychological assessment?

29. Identify and briefly discuss the theory/ies underlying the following tests:

  • WAIS-III
  • RPM
  • ART
  • SAWAIS
  • KAUFMAN
  • CAS
  • 16-PF SA92
  • MBTI
  • BTI
  • MCMI-III
  • DAP
  • TAT
  • SDS
  • MB-10
  • MSCI

30. What are the advantages and disadvantages of online based testing?

31. What are the advantages and disadvantages of paper-and-pencil testing?

32. Distinguish between:

  • Verbal and non-verbal intelligence
  • Fluid and crystallised intelligence
  • Structured and projective personality assessment

34. Identify and discuss the four main approaches that underlie career counseling assessment.

35. What is dynamic assessment?

36. Why is dynamic assessment useful in the South African context?

37. What is school readiness assessment?

38. If you were asked to conduct a school readiness assessment, you would need to assess a child’s functioning in three broad areas. What are these?

39. What is competency assessment?

40. What is an assessment centre?

41. Besides tests, what other techniques are commonly used in organizational settings to assess individuals?

Legislation, ethics and scope of practice documents for psychologists, registered counsellors and psychometrists

The HPCSA requires that all psychologists, psychometrists and registered counsellors be familiar with the following documents:

Industrial Psychology                       

Research Psychology     study material

Educational Psychology

Clinical  Psychology

Counselling Psychology

Psychometrists

Registered Consellor

NEO-PI-R & FFM REFERENCES

NEO-PI-R & FFM REFERENCES

Allik, J. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A Five-Factor Theory perspective. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 303-322). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Allik, J. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13-28.

Allik, J., Mottus, R., Realo, A., Pullmann, H., Trifonova, A., McCrae, R. R., Meshcheryakov, B. G. & 54 members of the Russian Character and Personality Survey. (2009). How national character is constructed: Personality traits attributed to the typical Russian. Psychological Journal of International University of Nature, Society and Human “Dubna”, 1, 1-23.

Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321-1353.

Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.

Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.

Block, J. (2001). Millenial contrarianism: The Five-Factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98-107.

Bock, P. K. (2000) Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioral Scientist,44, 32-40.

Bond, M. H. (1994). Trait theory and cross-cultural studies of person perception. Psychological Enquiry, 5, 114-117.

Branco E Silva, L & Laher, S. (2012). Exploring the utility of the NEO-PI-R in a sample of South African university students. IFE Psychologia

Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and the five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford Press.

Buss, D. M. (2003). Evolutionary personality psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? A Perspective on Psychological Science, 4, 359-366.

Cervone, D. (2004a). Personality assessment: Tapping the social-cognitive architecture of personality. Behavior Therapy, 35, 113-129.

Cervone, D. (2004b). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183-204.

Cheung, F. M. (2004). Use of Western and indigenously developed personality tests in Asia. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53,173-191.

Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F. & Yeh, K. H. (2008). Relevance of Openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 81-108.

Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z. & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407-433.

Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651-703.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised Neo Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 179-198). London: SAGE Publications.

Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A. & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (2002). Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Dalton, M. & Wilson, M. (2000). The relationship of the Five-Factor Model of personality to job performance for a group of Middle Eastern expatriate managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 250-258.

De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & collaborators of the Adolescent Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16, 301-311.

DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.

Dollinger, S. J. & Leong, F. T. (1993). Volunteer bias and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Psychology, 127, 29-36.

Franklin-Ross, D. (2009). Exploring language bias in the NEO-PI-R. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Gallinat, J., Kunz, D., Lang, U. E. & Neu, P. (2007). Association between cerebral glutamate and human behaviour: The sensation-seeking personality trait. Neuroimage, 34, 671-678.

Gardini, S., Cloninger, C. S. & Venneri, A. (2009). Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions. Brain Research Bulletin, 179, 265-270.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165).Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.

Goldberg, L. R. (1995). What the hell took so long? Donald W. Fiske and the Big-Five factor structure. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A Festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske  (pp. 29-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gulgoz, S. (2002). Five-factor model and the NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 175-196). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Heaven, P. C. & Pretorius, A. (1998). Personality structure among Black and White South Africans. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 664-666.

Heaven, P. C. L., Connors, J. & Stones, C. R. (1994). Three or five personality dimensions? An analysis of natural language terms in two cultures. Journal of Personality & Individual Differences 17, 181-189.

Heine, S. J. &  Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 369-394.

Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H. & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model of personality in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112-125.

Higgins, E. T. (2008). Culture and personality: Variability across universal motives as the missing link. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 608-634.

Hofstede, G. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52-88.

Horn, B. S. (2000). A Xhosa translation of the revised Neo Personality Inventory: A pilot study. Unpublished master’s dissertation (Counselling Psychology). University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement & theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.

Kaplan, R. M. & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2009). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1999). Towards an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 321-951.

Kline, P. (1993). Personality: The psychometric view. New York: Routledge.

Konstabel, K., Realo, A. & Kallasmaa, T. (2002). Exploring sources of variations in the structure of personality traits across cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 29-53). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Kosek, R. B. (1999). Adaptation if the Big Five as a hermeneutic instrument for religious constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 229-237.

Kwong, J. Y. Y. & Cheung, F. M. (2003). Prediction of performance facets using specific personality traits in the Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 99-110.

Laher, S. (2008). Structural equivalence and the NEO-PI-R: Implications for the applicability of the Five Factor Model of personality in an African context. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34, 76-80.

Laher, S. (2010). Exploring the relationship between religious orientation and the Five Factor Model of personality in a sample of university students. New Voices in Psychology, 6, 4-22.

Laher, S. (2010, August). Personality theory and assessment research in South Africa: A review. Paper presented at the 16th South African Psychology Congress, International Convention Centre, Durban, South Africa.

Teferi, T.B. & Laher, S. (in press). Exploring the reliability and validity of a Tigrignan translation of the NEO-PI-R in an Eritrean sample. IFE Psychologia.

Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (in press). Introduction. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Laher, S. & Quy, G. (2009). Exploring the role of spirituality in the context of the Five Factor Model of personality in a South African sample. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19(4), 513-521.

Lai, P. C. (1999). Loss of face, acculturation, self-esteem, and birth-order among Chinese-Americans. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(6-B), 3018.

Larsen, R. J. & Buss, D. M. (2008). Personality psychology: Domains about human nature. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S. & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality: measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 227-248). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Lönnqvist, J. E. L., Paunonen, S., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., Tuulio-Henriksson, A. & Lönnqvist, J. (2007). Personality characteristics of research volunteers. European Journal of Personality, 21, 1017-1030.

Luo, X., Kranzler, H. R., Zuo, L., Zhang, H., Wang, S. & Gelertner, J. (2007). CHRM2 variation predisposers to personality traits of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Human Molecular Genetics, 16, 1557-1568.

MacDonald, K. (1998). Evolution, culture and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119-149.

MacDonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the Five Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68, 153-197.

Maheshwari, N. & Kumar, V. (2008). Personal effectiveness as a function of psychological androgyny. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 17, 39-45.

Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63-87.

Matsimbi, W. E. (1997). Cross-cultural generalisability of the Five Factor Model: A study on South African white collar males. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of the

Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Mayer, J. D. (1998). A systems framework for the field of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 118-144.

Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 60, 294-307.

McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295-321.

McAdams, D. P. & Pals, J. L. (2006). A New Big Five: Fundamental principles for an Integrative Science of Personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.

McAdams, D. P. & Walden, K. (2010). Jack Block, the Big Five, and personality from the standpoints of actor, agent, and author. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 50-56.

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.

McCrae, R.R. (1999). Mainstream personality psychology and the study of religion. Journal of Personality, 67, 1209-1218.

McCrae, R. R. (2000). Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10-31.

McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819-846.

McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparison. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik. (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 105-125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

McCrae, R. R. (2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 3-14.

McCrae, R. R. (2009). Personality profiles of cultures: Patterns of ethos. European Journal of Personality, 23, 205-227.

McCrae, R. R. & Allik, J. (2002). Introduction. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 1-5). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2004). Age differences in personality traits across cultures: Self-report and observer perspectives. European Journal of Personality, 18, 143-157.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008a). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five Factor Model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273-294). London: SAGE Publications.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008b). The Five Factor Theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 157-180). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P. & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171-188.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr. & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261-270.

McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A. & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005a). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561.

McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A. & 78 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005b). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407-425.

McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H. & Paulhus, D. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1041-1055.

McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Bond, M. H. & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 70, 552-566.

Meyer, W., Moore, C. & Viljoen, H. (2003). Personology: From individual to ecosystem. Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Michalski, R. L. & Shackelford, T. K. (2010). Evolutionary personality psychology: Reconciling human nature and individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 509-516.

Miller, T. R. (1991). The psychotherapeutic utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality: A clinician’s experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 415-433.

Moerdyk, A. (2009). The principles and practice of psychological assessment. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Mohammed, E. F., Unher, M. & Sugawara, M. (2009). Big Five personality factors: Cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and Egyptian students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 8, 135-141.

Morasco, B. J., Gfeller, J. D. & Elder, A. K. (2007). The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: A comparison with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 276-283.

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M. & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58, 447-478.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Murphy, K. R. & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Mwamwenda, T. S. (2004). Educational psychology: An African perspective (3rd. ed.) Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Naidoo, P., Townsend, L. & Carolissen, R. (2008). Mainstream theories and non-mainstream approaches to personality. In L. Swartz, C. de la Rey, N. Duncan & L. Townsend (Eds.), Psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 117-139). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Nel, J. A. (2008). Uncovering personality dimensions in eleven different language groups in South Africa: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the North-West, Potchefstroom.

Nell, V. (1999). Standardising the WAIS-III and the WMS-III for South Africa: Legislative, psychometric and policy issues. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 128-137.

Norman, W. T. (1967). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.

Ogbonnaya, A. O. (1994). Person as community: An African understanding of the person as an intrapsychic community. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 75-87.

Okeke, B. I., Draguns, J. G., Sheku, B. & Allen, W. (1999). Culture, self and personality in Africa. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 139-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ozer, D. J. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the predictions of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.

Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (1998). The structured assessment of personality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 150-170.

Paunonen, S. V. & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821-836.

Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J. & Forsteling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447-456.

Paunonen, S. V., Zeidner, M., Engvik, H. A., Oosterveld, P. & Maliphant, R. (2000). The nonverbal assessment of personality in five cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 220-239.

Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113.

Pervin, L. A. (1999). The cross-cultural challenge to personality. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 23-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (2001). Personality: Theory and research (8th ed.). New York: Wiley.

Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985-1013.

Piedmont, R. L., Bain, E., McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). The applicability of the Five Factor Model in a sub-Saharan culture: The NEO-PI-R in Shona. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 155-174). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Poortinga, Y. H., Van de Vijver, F. & Van Hemert, D. A. (2002). Cross cultural equivalence of the Big Five: A tentative interpretation of the evidence. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 281-303). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Quirk, S. W., Christiansen, N. D., Wagner, S. H. & McNutty, J. L. (2003). On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: Evidence for the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 15, 311-325.

Quy, G. (2007). The Five-Factor Model of personality and spirituality. Unpublished honour’s research report (Psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Rolland, J. P. (2002). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Five Factor Model of personality. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 7-28). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Rossier, J., Dahourou, D. & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 227–246.

Rothman, S. & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 68-74.

Rushton, J. P. & Irwing, P. (2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679-683.

Ryckman, R. (2008). Theories of personality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the Five Factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15-25.

Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296-1312.

Schroeder, M. L., Wormworth, J. A. & Livesley, W. J. (1992). Dimensions of personality disorder and their relationships to the Big Five dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment, 4, 47-53.

Schultz, P. & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Seekings, J. & Nattrass, N. (2006). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Scottsville: UKZN Press.

Storm, K. & Rothmann, S. (2003). The relationship between burnout, personality traits and coping strategies in a corporate pharmaceutical group. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 35-42.

Taylor, A. & MacDonald, D. A. (1999). Religion and the Five-Factor Model of personality: An exploratory investigation using a Canadian university sample. Personality and Individual Difference, 27, 1243-1259.

Taylor, I. A. (2000). The construct comparability of the NEO-PI-R questionnaire for black and white employees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.

Teferi, T. B. (2004). The application of the NEO-PI-R in the Eritrean context. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 999-1009.

Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., Brant, L. J. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2005). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging, 20, 493-506.

Triandis, H. C. & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 133-160.

Trull, T. J., Useda, J. D., Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychology Five (PSY-5), The NEO PI and the NEO PI-R. Psychological Assessment, 7, 508-516.

Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.

Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 283-303.

Vogt, L. & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the Five Factor Model of personality: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39-54.

Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model. In P. T. Costa, Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 431-456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wiggins, J. S. (1996). The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.

Wiggins, J. S. & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-interactional perspective on the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88-162). New York: Guilford Press.

Zhang, L-F. & Akande, A. (2002). What relates to the Big Five among South African university students? IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal, 10, 49-74.

 

NEO-PI-R & FFM REFERENCES

NEO-PI-R & FFM REFERENCES

Allik, J. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A Five-Factor Theory perspective. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 303-322). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Allik, J. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13-28.

Allik, J., Mottus, R., Realo, A., Pullmann, H., Trifonova, A., McCrae, R. R., Meshcheryakov, B. G. & 54 members of the Russian Character and Personality Survey. (2009). How national character is constructed: Personality traits attributed to the typical Russian. Psychological Journal of International University of Nature, Society and Human “Dubna”, 1, 1-23.

Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321-1353.

Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.

Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.

Block, J. (2001). Millenial contrarianism: The Five-Factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98-107.

Bock, P. K. (2000) Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioral Scientist,44, 32-40.

Bond, M. H. (1994). Trait theory and cross-cultural studies of person perception. Psychological Enquiry, 5, 114-117.

Branco E Silva, L & Laher, S. (2012). Exploring the utility of the NEO-PI-R in a sample of South African university students. IFE Psychologia

Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and the five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford Press.

Buss, D. M. (2003). Evolutionary personality psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? A Perspective on Psychological Science, 4, 359-366.

Cervone, D. (2004a). Personality assessment: Tapping the social-cognitive architecture of personality. Behavior Therapy, 35, 113-129.

Cervone, D. (2004b). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183-204.

Cheung, F. M. (2004). Use of Western and indigenously developed personality tests in Asia. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53,173-191.

Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F. & Yeh, K. H. (2008). Relevance of Openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 81-108.

Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z. & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407-433.

Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651-703.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised Neo Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 179-198). London: SAGE Publications.

Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A. & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.

Costa, P. T., Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (2002). Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Dalton, M. & Wilson, M. (2000). The relationship of the Five-Factor Model of personality to job performance for a group of Middle Eastern expatriate managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 250-258.

De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & collaborators of the Adolescent Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16, 301-311.

DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.

Dollinger, S. J. & Leong, F. T. (1993). Volunteer bias and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Psychology, 127, 29-36.

Franklin-Ross, D. (2009). Exploring language bias in the NEO-PI-R. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Gallinat, J., Kunz, D., Lang, U. E. & Neu, P. (2007). Association between cerebral glutamate and human behaviour: The sensation-seeking personality trait. Neuroimage, 34, 671-678.

Gardini, S., Cloninger, C. S. & Venneri, A. (2009). Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions. Brain Research Bulletin, 179, 265-270.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165).Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.

Goldberg, L. R. (1995). What the hell took so long? Donald W. Fiske and the Big-Five factor structure. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A Festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske  (pp. 29-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gulgoz, S. (2002). Five-factor model and the NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 175-196). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Heaven, P. C. & Pretorius, A. (1998). Personality structure among Black and White South Africans. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 664-666.

Heaven, P. C. L., Connors, J. & Stones, C. R. (1994). Three or five personality dimensions? An analysis of natural language terms in two cultures. Journal of Personality & Individual Differences 17, 181-189.

Heine, S. J. &  Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 369-394.

Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H. & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model of personality in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112-125.

Higgins, E. T. (2008). Culture and personality: Variability across universal motives as the missing link. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 608-634.

Hofstede, G. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52-88.

Horn, B. S. (2000). A Xhosa translation of the revised Neo Personality Inventory: A pilot study. Unpublished master’s dissertation (Counselling Psychology). University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement & theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.

Kaplan, R. M. & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2009). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1999). Towards an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 321-951.

Kline, P. (1993). Personality: The psychometric view. New York: Routledge.

Konstabel, K., Realo, A. & Kallasmaa, T. (2002). Exploring sources of variations in the structure of personality traits across cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 29-53). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Kosek, R. B. (1999). Adaptation if the Big Five as a hermeneutic instrument for religious constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 229-237.

Kwong, J. Y. Y. & Cheung, F. M. (2003). Prediction of performance facets using specific personality traits in the Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 99-110.

Laher, S. (2008). Structural equivalence and the NEO-PI-R: Implications for the applicability of the Five Factor Model of personality in an African context. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34, 76-80.

Laher, S. (2010). Exploring the relationship between religious orientation and the Five Factor Model of personality in a sample of university students. New Voices in Psychology, 6, 4-22.

Laher, S. (2010, August). Personality theory and assessment research in South Africa: A review. Paper presented at the 16th South African Psychology Congress, International Convention Centre, Durban, South Africa.

Teferi, T.B. & Laher, S. (in press). Exploring the reliability and validity of a Tigrignan translation of the NEO-PI-R in an Eritrean sample. IFE Psychologia.

Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (in press). Introduction. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Laher, S. & Quy, G. (2009). Exploring the role of spirituality in the context of the Five Factor Model of personality in a South African sample. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19(4), 513-521.

Lai, P. C. (1999). Loss of face, acculturation, self-esteem, and birth-order among Chinese-Americans. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(6-B), 3018.

Larsen, R. J. & Buss, D. M. (2008). Personality psychology: Domains about human nature. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S. & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality: measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 227-248). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Lönnqvist, J. E. L., Paunonen, S., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., Tuulio-Henriksson, A. & Lönnqvist, J. (2007). Personality characteristics of research volunteers. European Journal of Personality, 21, 1017-1030.

Luo, X., Kranzler, H. R., Zuo, L., Zhang, H., Wang, S. & Gelertner, J. (2007). CHRM2 variation predisposers to personality traits of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Human Molecular Genetics, 16, 1557-1568.

MacDonald, K. (1998). Evolution, culture and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119-149.

MacDonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the Five Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68, 153-197.

Maheshwari, N. & Kumar, V. (2008). Personal effectiveness as a function of psychological androgyny. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 17, 39-45.

Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63-87.

Matsimbi, W. E. (1997). Cross-cultural generalisability of the Five Factor Model: A study on South African white collar males. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of the

Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Mayer, J. D. (1998). A systems framework for the field of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 118-144.

Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 60, 294-307.

McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295-321.

McAdams, D. P. & Pals, J. L. (2006). A New Big Five: Fundamental principles for an Integrative Science of Personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.

McAdams, D. P. & Walden, K. (2010). Jack Block, the Big Five, and personality from the standpoints of actor, agent, and author. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 50-56.

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.

McCrae, R.R. (1999). Mainstream personality psychology and the study of religion. Journal of Personality, 67, 1209-1218.

McCrae, R. R. (2000). Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10-31.

McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819-846.

McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparison. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik. (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 105-125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

McCrae, R. R. (2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 3-14.

McCrae, R. R. (2009). Personality profiles of cultures: Patterns of ethos. European Journal of Personality, 23, 205-227.

McCrae, R. R. & Allik, J. (2002). Introduction. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 1-5). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2004). Age differences in personality traits across cultures: Self-report and observer perspectives. European Journal of Personality, 18, 143-157.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008a). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five Factor Model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273-294). London: SAGE Publications.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008b). The Five Factor Theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 157-180). New York: Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P. & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171-188.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr. & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261-270.

McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A. & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005a). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561.

McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A. & 78 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005b). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407-425.

McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H. & Paulhus, D. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1041-1055.

McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Bond, M. H. & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 70, 552-566.

Meyer, W., Moore, C. & Viljoen, H. (2003). Personology: From individual to ecosystem. Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Michalski, R. L. & Shackelford, T. K. (2010). Evolutionary personality psychology: Reconciling human nature and individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 509-516.

Miller, T. R. (1991). The psychotherapeutic utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality: A clinician’s experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 415-433.

Moerdyk, A. (2009). The principles and practice of psychological assessment. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Mohammed, E. F., Unher, M. & Sugawara, M. (2009). Big Five personality factors: Cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and Egyptian students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 8, 135-141.

Morasco, B. J., Gfeller, J. D. & Elder, A. K. (2007). The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: A comparison with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 276-283.

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M. & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58, 447-478.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Murphy, K. R. & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Mwamwenda, T. S. (2004). Educational psychology: An African perspective (3rd. ed.) Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Naidoo, P., Townsend, L. & Carolissen, R. (2008). Mainstream theories and non-mainstream approaches to personality. In L. Swartz, C. de la Rey, N. Duncan & L. Townsend (Eds.), Psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 117-139). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Nel, J. A. (2008). Uncovering personality dimensions in eleven different language groups in South Africa: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the North-West, Potchefstroom.

Nell, V. (1999). Standardising the WAIS-III and the WMS-III for South Africa: Legislative, psychometric and policy issues. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 128-137.

Norman, W. T. (1967). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.

Ogbonnaya, A. O. (1994). Person as community: An African understanding of the person as an intrapsychic community. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 75-87.

Okeke, B. I., Draguns, J. G., Sheku, B. & Allen, W. (1999). Culture, self and personality in Africa. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 139-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ozer, D. J. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the predictions of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.

Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (1998). The structured assessment of personality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 150-170.

Paunonen, S. V. & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821-836.

Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J. & Forsteling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447-456.

Paunonen, S. V., Zeidner, M., Engvik, H. A., Oosterveld, P. & Maliphant, R. (2000). The nonverbal assessment of personality in five cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 220-239.

Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113.

Pervin, L. A. (1999). The cross-cultural challenge to personality. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 23-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (2001). Personality: Theory and research (8th ed.). New York: Wiley.

Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985-1013.

Piedmont, R. L., Bain, E., McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). The applicability of the Five Factor Model in a sub-Saharan culture: The NEO-PI-R in Shona. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 155-174). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Poortinga, Y. H., Van de Vijver, F. & Van Hemert, D. A. (2002). Cross cultural equivalence of the Big Five: A tentative interpretation of the evidence. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 281-303). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Quirk, S. W., Christiansen, N. D., Wagner, S. H. & McNutty, J. L. (2003). On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: Evidence for the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 15, 311-325.

Quy, G. (2007). The Five-Factor Model of personality and spirituality. Unpublished honour’s research report (Psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Rolland, J. P. (2002). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Five Factor Model of personality. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 7-28). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Rossier, J., Dahourou, D. & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 227–246.

Rothman, S. & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 68-74.

Rushton, J. P. & Irwing, P. (2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679-683.

Ryckman, R. (2008). Theories of personality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the Five Factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15-25.

Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296-1312.

Schroeder, M. L., Wormworth, J. A. & Livesley, W. J. (1992). Dimensions of personality disorder and their relationships to the Big Five dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment, 4, 47-53.

Schultz, P. & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Seekings, J. & Nattrass, N. (2006). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Scottsville: UKZN Press.

Storm, K. & Rothmann, S. (2003). The relationship between burnout, personality traits and coping strategies in a corporate pharmaceutical group. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 35-42.

Taylor, A. & MacDonald, D. A. (1999). Religion and the Five-Factor Model of personality: An exploratory investigation using a Canadian university sample. Personality and Individual Difference, 27, 1243-1259.

Taylor, I. A. (2000). The construct comparability of the NEO-PI-R questionnaire for black and white employees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.

Teferi, T. B. (2004). The application of the NEO-PI-R in the Eritrean context. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 999-1009.

Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., Brant, L. J. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2005). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging, 20, 493-506.

Triandis, H. C. & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 133-160.

Trull, T. J., Useda, J. D., Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychology Five (PSY-5), The NEO PI and the NEO PI-R. Psychological Assessment, 7, 508-516.

Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.

Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 283-303.

Vogt, L. & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the Five Factor Model of personality: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39-54.

Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model. In P. T. Costa, Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 431-456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wiggins, J. S. (1996). The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.

Wiggins, J. S. & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-interactional perspective on the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88-162). New York: Guilford Press.

Zhang, L-F. & Akande, A. (2002). What relates to the Big Five among South African university students? IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal, 10, 49-74.

 

Personality Assessment in South Africa and Africa

Personality Assessment in South Africa and Africa

Abrahams, F. (1996). The cross-cultural applicability of the 16 Personality Factors Inventory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Abrahams, F. (2002). The (un)fair useage of the 16PF (SA92) in South Africa: A response to C. H. Prinsloo and I. Ebersöhn. South African Journal of Psychology, 32, 58-61.

Abrahams, F. & Mauer, K. F. (1999a). The comparability of the constructs of the 16PF in the South African context. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 53-59.

Abrahams, F. & Mauer, K. F. (1999b). Qualitative and statistical impacts of home language on responses to the items of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 76-86.

Ajani-ya-Azibo, D. (1991). Towards a metatheory of African personality. Journal of Black Psychology, 17, 37-45.

Bedell, B., Van Eeden, R. & Van Staden, F. (1999). Culture as a moderator variable in psychological test performance: Issues and trends in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 1-7.

Bhana, K. (1987). Psychological research with Indian South Africans: Explorations in method. In K. F. Mauer & A. I. Retief (Eds.), Psychology in context: Cross-cultural research trends in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Botha, A. & Laher, S. (in press). Methods of sampling. In B. Kawulich, M.Garner & C. Wagner (Eds.), Social research methods for developing world contexts. London: McGraw-Hill.

Cartwright, D. (2008). Psychopathology. In L. Swartz, C. de la Rey, N. Duncan & L. Townsend (Eds.), Psychology: An introduction (pp. 450-467). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Claasen, N. C. W. (1997). Cultural differences, politics and test bias in South Africa. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 297-307.

England, J. (1991). Personality assessment: A review with special reference to the South African situation. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Foxcroft, C. (2002). Ethical issues related to psychological testing in Africa: What I have learned (so far). In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes & D. N. Sattler (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 5, Chapter 4). Retrieved May 16, 2010, from: http://orpc.iaccp.org/index.php?view=article&catid=23%3Achapter&id=45%3Afoxcroft&format=pdf&option=com_content

Foxcroft, C. (2004). Planning a psychological test in the multicultural South African context. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 8-15.

Foxcroft, C. & Davies, C. (2008). Historical perspectives on psychometric testing in South Africa. In C. van Ommen & D. Painter (Eds.), Interiors: A history of psychology in South Africa (pp.152-182). Pretoria: UNISA Press.

Foxcroft, C., Paterson, H., Le Roux, N. & Herbst, D. (2004). Psychological assessment in South Africa: A needs analysis. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Foxcroft, C. & Roodt, G. (2008). An introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (2nd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Franklin-Ross, D. (2009). Exploring language bias in the NEO-PI-R. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Heaven, P. C. & Pretorius, A. (1998). Personality structure among Black and White South Africans. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 664-666.

Heaven, P. C. L., Connors, J. & Stones, C. R. (1994). Three or five personality dimensions? An analysis of natural language terms in two cultures. Journal of Personality & Individual Differences 17, 181-189.

Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H. & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model of personality in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112-125.

Horn, B. S. (2000). A Xhosa translation of the revised Neo Personality Inventory: A pilot study. Unpublished master’s dissertation (Counselling Psychology). University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

Laher, S. & Croxford, S. (in press). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus – Exploring gender differences in personality in a SA context. South African Journal of Human Resources Management.

Teferi, T.B. & Laher, S. (in press). Exploring the reliability and validity of a Tigrignan translation of the NEO-PI-R in an Eritrean sample. IFE Psychologia.

Branco E Silva, L & Laher, S. (2012). Exploring the utility of the NEO-PI-R in a sample of South African university students. IFE Psychologia

Patel, A. & Laher, S. (2011). The influence of Mode of Test Administration on Test Performance. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21, 143-148.

Silva, A. & Laher, S. (2011). Religious orientation and personality styles in psychology students. Ife PsycholoGIA, 20, 19-48.

Laher, S. (2010). Using exploratory factor analysis in personality research: Best practice recommendations. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1-7.

Laher, S. (2010). Exploring the relationship between religious orientation and the Five Factor Model of personality in a sample of university students. New Voices in Psychology, 6, 4-22.

Laher, S. & Quy, G. (2009). Exploring the Role of Spirituality in the Context of the Five Factor Model of Personality in a South African Sample. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19, 4, 513-521.

Vogt, L. & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the Five Factor Model of personality: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39-54.

Laher, S., & Mokone, M. (2008). Exploring the reliability and validity of the DAT-K in Grade 11 learners in a previously disadvantaged school in Johannesburg. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18, 249-254.

Laher, S. (2008). Structural equivalence and the NEO-PI-R: Implications for the applicability of the Five Factor model of personality in an African context. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34, 76-80.

Laher, S. (2007). Personality reconceptualised: A Millonian Approach? South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 82-95.

Laher, S.& Botha, A. (2012). Methods of sampling. In C. Wagner, B.Kawulich & M. Garner. Doing social research: A global context (Pp.86-100). London: McGraw-Hill

Laher, S. (in press). The NEO-PI-R in South Africa. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: Research and Applications. Wits University Press: Johannesburg.

R. Patel & Laher, S. (in press). The Millon inventories in South Africa. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: Research and Applications. Wits University Press: Johannesburg.

Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (in press). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: Situating the debates. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: Research and Applications. Wits University Press: Johannesburg.

Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (in press). Current and Future trends in assessment in South Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.). Psychological Assessment in South Africa: Research and Applications. Wits University Press: Johannesburg.

Louw, D. J. (2001). Ubuntu and the challenges of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Retrieved January 25, 2007, from: http://www.phys.uu.nl/~unitwin/ubuntu.html.

Ma, V. & Schoeneman, T. J. (1997). Individualism versus collectivism: A comparison of Kenyan and American self-concepts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 261-73.

Marx, C (2002). Ubu and Ubuntu: On the dialectics of apartheid and nation building. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 29, 49-69.

Matsimbi, W. E. (1997). Cross-cultural generalisability of the Five Factor Model: A study on South African white collar males. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of the

Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Mbeki, T. (2003). The second economy, what it is and what is needed to meet the growth and development challenges it presents. Address of the president to the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). Retrieved December 7, 2009, from: http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2003/03111115461004.htm

Meiring, D. (2006). South African Personality Inventory Project. Retrieved October 11, 2007, from: http://www.meiringd.co.za/sapi.htm

Meiring, D. (2008). Bias and equivalence of psychological measures in South Africa.Ridderkerk, the Netherlands: Labyrinth Publications.

Meiring, D. (2010, July). The SAPI in South Africa. Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the Society for Industrial/Organisational Psychology in South Africa, The Forum Campus, Bryanston, South Africa.

Meiring, D., Van de Vijver, F. J. & Rothmann, S. R. (2006). Bias in an adapted version of the 15FQ+ questionnaire in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 340-356.

Meiring, D., Van de Vijver, F., Rothmann, S. & Barrick, M. R. (2005). Construct, item and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 1-8.

Meyer, W., Moore, C. & Viljoen, H. (2003). Personology: From individual to ecosystem. Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Mkhize, N. J. (2004). Culture and the self in moral and ethical decision-making: A dialogical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Moerdyk, A. (2009). The principles and practice of psychological assessment. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Mohammed, E. F., Unher, M. & Sugawara, M. (2009). Big Five personality factors: Cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and Egyptian students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 8, 135-141.

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M. & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58, 447-478.

Mpofu, E. (2001). Exploring the self concept in African culture. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 341-354.

Mwamwenda, T. S. (2004). Educational psychology: An African perspective (3rd. ed.) Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.

Naidoo, P., Townsend, L. & Carolissen, R. (2008). Mainstream theories and non-mainstream approaches to personality. In L. Swartz, C. de la Rey, N. Duncan & L. Townsend (Eds.), Psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 117-139). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Nel, J. A. (2008). Uncovering personality dimensions in eleven different language groups in South Africa: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the North-West, Potchefstroom.

Nell, V. (1999). Standardising the WAIS-III and the WMS-III for South Africa: Legislative, psychometric and policy issues. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 128-137.

Nzimande, B. (1995, June). To test or not to test? Paper presented at the Congress on Psychometrics, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria.

Office of the President. (1998). Employment Equity Act (Act No. 55, 1998). Government Gazette Vol. 400, No. 19370, 19 October 1998.

Ogbonnaya, A. O. (1994). Person as community: An African understanding of the person as an intrapsychic community. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 75-87.

Okeke, B. I., Draguns, J. G., Sheku, B. & Allen, W. (1999). Culture, self and personality in Africa. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 139-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Piedmont, R. L., Bain, E., McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). The applicability of the Five Factor Model in a sub-Saharan culture: The NEO-PI-R in Shona. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 155-174). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Philip, K. & Hassen, E. (2008). The review of the Second Economy Programmes: An overview for the Presidency’s 15 Year Review. Pretoria: Trade and Industrial Policy Secretariat.

Presidency. (2007). Towards a fifteen year review. Pretoria: Government Communication and Information Service.

Project Literacy. (2010). Project Literacy: Leaders in Adult Learning. Retrieved, July 3, 2010, from: http://www.projectliteracy.org.za/

Quy, G. (2007). The Five-Factor Model of personality and spirituality. Unpublished honour’s research report (Psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Retief, A. (1992). The cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ – Bias or fruitful difference? South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 202-207.

Ritts, V. (2001). Personality, the self and culture. Retrieved February 12, 2003, from: http://www.stlcc.cc.mo.us/mc/users/vritts/self.html

Rossier, J., Dahourou, D. & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 227–246.

Rothman, S. & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 68-74.

Seekings, J. & Nattrass, N. (2006). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Scottsville: UKZN Press.

Sehlapelo, M. & Terre Blanche, M. (1996). Psychometric testing in South Africa: Views from above and below. Psychology in Society, 21, 49-59.

Shillington, S. J. (1988). An Afrikaans MMPI: Some variables which affect the response of normal Afrikaans population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Port Elizabeth.

Shutte, A. (2001). Ubuntu: An ethic for a new South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.

Shuttleworth-Edwards, A.B., Gaylard, E.K. & Radlof, S.E. (in press a). WAIS-III test performance in a SA context: Extension of an existing cross-cultural normative database. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Shuttleworth-Edwards, A.B., Van der Merwe, H. & Radlof, S.E. (in press b). WISC-IV test performance in a South African context: A collation of cross-cultural norms. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Shuttleworth-Jordan, A. B. (1996). On not reinventing the wheel: A clinical perspective on culturally relevant test usage in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 26, 96-106.

Skinner, C. & Valodia, I. (2006). Two economies: Mistaken idea. South African Labour Bulletin, 30, 57-60.

Sow, A. I. (1980). Anthropological structures of madness in Black Africa. New York: International Universities Press.

Statistics South Africa (2001). Census 2001. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from:  http://www.statsa.gov.za/publications/populationstats.asp

Statistics South Africa. (2009). Mid-year population estimates 2009. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from: http://www.statsa.gov.za/publications/populationstats.asp

Stevens, G. (2008). Ethnicity. In L. Swartz, C. de la Rey, N. Duncan & L. Townsend (Eds.), Psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 321-333). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Storm, K. & Rothmann, S. (2003). The relationship between burnout, personality traits and coping strategies in a corporate pharmaceutical group. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 35-42.

Swanson, S. (2007). Ubuntu: An African contribution to (re) research for/with a humble togetherness. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 2, 53-67.

Taylor, I. A. (2000). The construct comparability of the NEO-PI-R questionnaire for black and white employees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.

Taylor, N. (2004) The construction of a South African Five Factor personality questionnaire. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.

Taylor, N. & De Bruin, G. P. (2005). Basic Traits Inventory: Technical manual. Johannesburg: Jopie van Rooyen & Partners, SA.

Taylor, T. R. & Boeyens, J. C. A. (1991). The comparability of the scores of Blacks and Whites on the South African personality questionnaire: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 1-11.

Teferi, T. B. (2004). The application of the NEO-PI-R in the Eritrean context. Unpublished master’s dissertation (research psychology), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Terre Blanche, M., Durrheim, K. & Painter, D. (2008). Research in practice(2nd ed.). Cape Town: UCT Press.

Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.

Van der Berg, S., Burger, R. & Louw, M. (2010). Post-apartheid South Africa: Poverty and distribution. In Nissanke, M. & Thorbecke, E. (Eds.). Trends in an Era of Globalization: The Poor under Globalization in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van de Vijver, F. & Phalet, K. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: The role of acculturation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 215-236.

Van de Vijver, F. & Rothmann, S. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: The South African case. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 1-7.

Van Dyk, G. A. J. & De Kock, F. S. (2004). The relevance of the Individualism-Collectivism (IC) factor for the management of diversity in the South African National Defence Force. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 90-95.

Van Eeden, R. & Mantsha, T. (2007). Theoretical and methodological considerations in the translation of the 16PF5 into an African language. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 62-81.

Van Eeden, R. & Prinsloo, C. H. (1997). Using the South African version of the 16PF in a multicultural context. South African Journal of  Psychology, 27, 151-159.

Vogt, L. & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the Five Factor Model of personality: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39-54.

Zhang, L-F. & Akande, A. (2002). What relates to the Big Five among South African university students? IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal, 10, 49-74.

 

Assessing school Readiness References

Assessing school Readiness References

Brink, M. (1998). Clinical use of the SSAIS-R and using the JSAIS to evaluate school readiness.

Melville, South Africa. Unpublished workshop notes.

de Witt, M.W. (2009). The young child in context. A thematic approach. Perspectives from

educational psychology and sociopedagogics. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Decker, S.L., & McIntosh, D.E. (2010). Academic achievement measures in rehabilitation. In. E.

Mpofu and T. Oakland. (Eds.).  Assessment in Rehabilitation and Health. (pp.280-294). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Readiness for School: a relational construct. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 20-26.

Donald, D., Lazarus, S., & Lolwana, P.( 2010).  Educational Psychology in Social Context.

Ecosystemic applications in southern Africa (4th edition). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Duncan, G.J., Dowsett, C.J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A.C., Klebanov, P., Japel, C.(2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.436.1428

Edwards, B., Baxter, J., Smart, D., Sarson, A., & Hayes, A. (2009). Financial disadvantage and

children’s school readiness. Family Matters, 83, 23-31.

Panter, J.E., & Bracken, B.A. (2009). Validity of the Bracken School Readiness Assessment for

predicting first grade readiness. Psychology in the Schools, 46(5), 397-409. doi: 10.1002/pits.20385

Reber, A.S., & Reber, E.S. (2001). Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin Books.

Roodt, G., Stroud, L., Foxcroft, C., & Elkonin, D. (2009). The use of assessment measures in

various applied contexts. In C. Foxcroft & G. Roodt (Eds.). Introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context. Third Edition (pp. 203-224). Cape Town: Oxford Press.

Van Eeden, R., & De Beer, M. (2009). Assessment of cognitive functioning. In C. Foxcroft & G.

Roodt (Eds.). Introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context. Third Edition (pp. 128-147). Cape Town: Oxford Press.

Carlton, M.P., & Winsler, A. (1999). School readiness: The need for a paradigm  shift. School Psychology Review, 28(3), 338-353.

Department of Basic Education (2010). 2009 Country report : South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer.

Department of Education (2001a). Education White Paper 5: Early Childhood  Education: meeting the challenge of early childhood development in South Africa.   Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer.

Department of Education. (2001b). Education White Paper 6 Special Needs  Education.  Building an Inclusive Education and Training System. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer.

Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Readiness for school: A relational construct. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 20-26.

Engel, P. (1991). Tracking progress towards the school readiness goal. Education Leadership, 48(5), 39-42.

Foxcroft, C., Paterson, H., Roux, N., & Herbst, D. (2004).  Psychological assessment in South Africa: A needs analysis.  The test use patterns and needs of  psychological assessment practitioners. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.

Foxcroft, C., & Roodt, G. (2005). An introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (2nd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

Freeman, N., & Brown, M. (2008).  An authentic approach to pre-kindergarten programs: Redefining readiness. Childhood Education, 84 (5), 267-274.

Goldblatt, A. (2004). A Cross-cultural study of parent and teacher perceptions of school readiness (Unpublished Masters research report). University  of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Graue, M.E. (2006). The answer is readiness – Now what was the question? Early Education and Development, 17(1), 43-54.

Guhn, M, Janus, M., & Hertzman, C. (2007). The Early Development Instrument: Translating school readiness assessment into community actions and policy planning. Early Education and Development, 18 (3), 369-374.

Kagan, S.L. (2003). Children’s readiness for school: Issues in assessment. International Journal of Early Childhood, 35(1/2), 114-117.

Kriegler, S.M., & Skuy, M. (1996).  Perspectives on psychological assessment in  South African schools.  In P Engelbrecht, S.M. Kriegler & M.I. Booysen (Eds.), Perspectives on Learning Difficulties: International Concerns and South African Realities (pp. 109-122).  Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.

La Paro, K., & Pianca, R.C. (2000). Predicting children’s competence in the early school years: a meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 443-484.

Maxwell, K.L., & Clifford, R.M. (2004). School readiness assessment. YC Young Children, 59(1), 42-47.

Meisels, S.J. (1998). Assessing readiness. Center for the Improvement of Early  Reading Achievement, Ciera Report #3-002.

Nell, V. (2000).  Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: theory and  practice.  London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ramey, C.T., & Ramey, S.L. (2004).  Early learning and school readiness: can early intervention make a difference?  Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 50 (4), 471-491.

Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2004). School transition and school readiness : An outcome of early childhood development. In: R.E. Tremblay, R.G. Barr R.De V Peters (Eds.).

Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development; [online].Montreal, Quebec:Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development; 2004: 1-7.

Available at: http:/www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/Rimm-

KaufmanANGxp.pdf  [Retrieved on 05 June 2010].

Scott-Little, C., Kagan, S.L., & Frelow, V.S. (2006). Conceptualization of readiness and the content of early learning standards: The intersection of policy and research? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 153-173.

Sundelowitz, E. (2001). “Coming ready or not” The hide and seek of school  readiness in a historically “Model C” school (Unpublished Masters research dissertation). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

The Republic of South Africa. The Presidency (2009). Situational analysis of children in South Africa (2007-2008).

van Zyl, E. (2004). The relation between perceptual development (as part of school  readiness) and school success of Grade 1 learners. Africa Educational Research, 70(4), 147-159.

Venter,  A. (2000). Cross-cultural issues in child development and assessment within the South African context. South African Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12, 162–177.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Winter, S.M. (2009/2010). Interdisciplinary approaches to school readiness. Childhood  Education, 86(2), 96C.

Winter, S.M., & Kelley, M.F. (2008). Forty years of school readiness research: What have we learned? Childhood Education, 84(5), 260-267.

Winter, S.M., Zurcher, R., Hernandez, A., & Zenong, Y. (2007). The Early ON  school readiness project: A preliminary report. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(1), 55-69.